But, if it makes it more burdensome for me to use their products then I'm not happy. They have every right to charge a fee for the work they put in.
I'm not sure how I feel about Hilti charging a fee. Their programs are either extremely simple (RAM) or have been discontinued (RISABase). How many of the competitors do irregular shaped base plates and anchor rod layouts?ģ) The regular software folks (RISA, RAM, et cetera) have largely abandoned baseplates. There are a lot of features in the program now. RE: Hilti Profis Suite to start charging a license feeġ) If this is a tool merely meant to promote Hilti products and make them easier to specify or design, then this is a bad idea.Ģ) My impression is that this tool started out as that (merely meant to promote Hilti products), but that it has evolved. I hope that the subscription fee allows the developers to update the features and analysis more effectively. Personally, I like the functionality and accuracy of the software. It's doable, but a thick piece of code to work through with nuance. The other option is programming Annex D with the manufacturer's data. I've had some issues running the program, though. You can get the DDA for free and check Hiltis along with Dewalt anchors. But it saves old design templates and also can check plate stresses. My only beef with Profis is that it loads slow initially. If you stop the maintenance fee, the developer usually makes you buy the program again if it is more than 1-2 versions out. But every company has been tacking on yearly maintenance fees so you can upgrade and enhance.
So any design documentation needs to be printed and explicit, otherwise you'll lose all the work if you drop your subscription. Subscription fees always seem annoying because you don't own the software.
0 kommentar(er)
